The placebo effect is a bane of clinical trials. It is, however, a great tool in clinical practice. It is unethical to prescribe an actual placebo but there is no reason not to try to enhance the placebo effect when prescribing any treatment, pharmacological or non-drug.
German researchers decided to study what is called social observational learning (SoL). This was a double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial in 44 patients with chronic low-back pain (CLBP). They compared the effects of observing positive treatment outcomes in a sham or pretend patient versus hearing the same sham patient report neutral effects. In the SoL group, the sham patient told study patients about his improved pain due to amitriptyline and he also demonstrated his improved mobility by bending forwards and sideways. The same sham patient told the control group only that he was taking amitriptyline. The researchers collected data before and after the intervention and two weeks later. After the intervention, pain decreased in both groups with no difference between groups. The SoL group, however, showed a significantly larger decrease in perceived disability.
The authors concluded that “The CLBP patients’ direct observation of positive treatment outcomes in the sham patient appears to have enhanced the treatment effects, while indirect verbal reports of reduced pain did not.”
These findings are not surprising. I often have patients ask for a particular treatment because their friend or relative had a very good response to it. If it is a reasonable treatment for a particular patient, I usually oblige, hoping for an enhanced placebo effect.
